Are working conditions being flouted where you
work? |
Career prospects for teachers? |
|
There was once a time,in the days of voluntary after
school meetings that we as a Union opposed the 1265 hour imposition.
Over the last ten years, even in those schools where
INSET days (formerly holiday) have been joyous gatherings plus a free lunch,
time has taken its toll on teachers.
However annoying those pointless, 'top down' meetings
have been with last minute handouts, Advisor newspeak and off-the-point review
sheets, teachers by and large have soldiered through.
One thing we never dreamt would happen was that we
would defend those 1265 hours. We have now reached a point - and the National
union must take this seriously - that managers and governing bodies are, to put
it bluntly, trying it on. The Lilian Baylis experience is a warning to all
teachers and all trade unions. Every attempt has been made to tear up the Pay
and Conditions document by, among other things, enforcing a working directed
day which means that 1265 is exceeded.There are some important guidelines that
School Reps and members in general should be aware of.
The important paragraph to refer to in Pay and
Conditions is Paragraph 51. Management direction can only be given to 1265
hours in total. Directed time should not, therefore, be more than 32.5 hours
per week.
The number of hours worked must be noted. Every
teacher does additional hours undirected in terms of marking and preparation as
part of her or his professional duties. The new EU directive on working hours
clearly states that, unless the worker is a key executive, the total number of
hours worked must not exceed 48. If allowing for the variations that may occur
some weeks - parents evenings, school performances, exam marking and so on - it
is vital that no teacher exceeds this limit if measured over half a term or
so.
Union guidelines can protect teachers from much of
the nonsense, however only by members being vigilant on the ground will there
be any meaning to the action.
All too often are teachers persuaded into activities
that in the long run harmful to them. The TUC has advised for many years of the
need to have a lunchtime break. It is actually a health issue. (How many of us
work through lunch without management direction?) Yet, many attempts have been
made to reduce that lunch break which has been the only time between 8.00AM and
5.00PM that some teachers have had to unwind. The long-term effect of this is
becoming clear - the living jump at any early retirement package on offer.
While the dead are not renown for the best of lesson planning.
The time for school groups to meet is now - invite in
a Regional Official or a Local Officer if need be. If ever there was a lesson
of the last ten years it is that Lambeth as an authority or school managers can
pick off teachers one by one. Standing together is everything. |
1265 and PRP
With the imposition of PRP, it isn't clear as to how working
conditions are affected. However, all the signs are that teachers are not
getting £2,000 without Performance Management Conditions which will
inevitably put pressure on those teachers who 'go through the threshold' to be
managed outside the 1265 hours.
It is imperative that we do all in our power to prevent
individual teachers being given tasks that violate existing conditions.
If there are any concerns, please do contact us sooner
rather than later |
Are they trying it on in your school?
The Pay and Conditions document assumes that everyone
is reasonable. Hours worked will be reasonable. Instructions will be
reasonable. Managers will be reasonable.
So how many hours is reasonable? How many meetings
per-week is reasonable. This is such a vital issue because theere are so many
cases of managers thinking that meetings can be as endless as they want,as
frequent as they want. Pre-school briefings are called each day.
The NUT (with NASUWT) has balloted for action and
the advice to members is quite clear: NUT members need not attend more than a
total of 60 minutes meetings per week. If there are pre-school briefings, the
time taken will be deducted from the 60 minutes.
There will be no more than one after school meeting
per week, but if there is an urgent reason to call a second one in a particualr
week, with proper notice of 5 working days, that may happen, but it would need
to be cancelled out by the following week having no meeting after school at
all.
Management will say that they are directing staff,
according to Pay and Conditions. The National Union of teachers, protects
every member refusing to accept this bureaucratic overload because of an
existing ballot for action that is still in place. Copies of this
documentation are available if you contact the branch office.
Our action has started to be successful. One
headteacher was not only increasing the level of meetings this term, but was
expecting staff to be directed during lunch times, which is illegal.
Thanks to the members standing firm and the intervention of the NUT, the
Headteacher quite sensibly is prepared to negotiate.
In another situation, the Headteacher wanted members
to attend a meeting at 6.00PM, no warning given. Again, the mere mention of the
union's concern about this brought a hasty retreat!
If you are in doubt about your obligations, please
contact us at the Lambeth branch office. |
|
|
Charles Edward Brooke - a better example.
At Lambeth branch meetings, reports are given that
show just how much variance there is within the borough. Much depends on two
things: Firstly, the degree to which the headteacher values the staff.
Secondly, the unions, particularly the NUT ensuring that conditions are never
imposed which are unacceptable.
Following the union guidelines, the unions and the
management have agreed that there will only be one 60 minute meeting per week
involving all staff.
There are other meetings involving senior managers
, but meetings for pastoral and middle managers are scheduled within the one
hour a week quota - other staff have no meetings in those weeks - and are well
within the 1265 hours.
Apart from parents' evenings, which are a separate
concern, there is no compulsion for staff stay behind beyond the hour.
When, for example the open evening was organised,
the work was divided between those putting up displays and those staying for
the evening, rather than the poorly managed approach employed in so many
schools where all staff stay the whole time, quite needlessly. AT CEBS, the
open evening is counted as two 'weeks' - worth of meeting time which together
with similar arrangements for other events during the academic year, mean that
CEBS staff attend after school meetings for a maximum of 36 hours per year.
Staff without posts of responsibility do less than 36 hours.
If you wish to know more about CEB please contact
us. |
|
|
There are other forms of good practice. For
example, at St. Martins-in-the-Field, following a late evening with parents,
they quite sensibly arranged a late start.
It is perhaps re-assuring that even in this day and
age that some managers value the welfare of their
staff. Treating staff properly is actually beneficial to the
students! |
|
|
|