Old NUT logo - links to national NUT site

Lambeth Teacher with Lambeth NUT

leading teachers in defence of education

Bog Standard?

Alastair Campbell might be, but our kids are brilliant!

NUT logo - links to national NUT site
Lambeth NUT home page Complete list of contents Contacts at Lambeth NUT Dates - what's happening ? Conditions of Service Links to other sites
The attack on Comprehensive Education by a Government which would claim to inherit the welfare and egalitarian traditions of Labour in the past, is proposed in the latest Green Paper on Education. It is best seen as the Labour party's education manifesto for the coming election.
Lambeth Teacher is covering the debate, including the NUT's response to the Green Paper, the National Conference resolution.
Below, we publish a response from the Socialist Education Association which is definitely a loyal Labour affiliate, yet so outrageous is the attack on Comprehensives that they and others have had to come out and say something.
No doubt as the reality of the proposals - or indeed their failure - becomes evident, others will say something, too.

COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOLS: THE BEST SYSTEM

Comprehensive schools

  • are neighbourhood schools
  • are non-selective
  • value all children equally
  • reflect the population at large in the balance of ability and social mix
  • take in all children from 5 to 18
  • offer a common curriculum, including vocational education, to all pupils and tailor courses to nourish individual diversity
  • are essentially co-operative, not competitive
  • are part of a national structure of non-selective education should have sufficient human and financial resources to meet the various developmental needs of each pupil

Why comprehensive schools are the best

The argument for the comprehensive school was won in the 1960s and 1970s when it was conclusively shown that

  • selection at 11 + cannot be done accurately or fairly
  • children not selected for grammar schools can be left with a lifelong sense of failure and rejection
  • family members and friends are separated by selection
  • the educational potential of all children was not being realised in a selective system

These arguments were accepted by Conservative and Labour LEAs and Governments. Research, by York University, has recently demonstrated that comprehensive schools have achieved academic standards as good as or better than those in grammar schools and better than in secondary modern schools. A non-selective system outscores a selective one. All state primary and most state secondary pupils attend comprehensive schools. The percentage of children obtaining five or more GCSE passes rose from 17% in 1965 to 88% in 1998. A Level results have also risen consistently and substantially, as have the numbers of students going on to further and higher education.

Comprehensive schools set up systems of pastoral care, recognising that the welfare of all pupils and their social adjustment are basic to academic success and a stable society.

The undermining of the comprehensive school system

These achievements have been compromised and reduced by allegations of failure on the part of comprehensive schools: the failure has been that of successive governments to end selection and create a fully comprehensive system. Thus we still have a rump of over 160 grammar schools and several hundred secondary modern schools, together having a serious effect on the curriculum and use of time in their feeder primary schools. In addition a large number of schools, under a policy of the previous Tory government and continued by the present Labour one, are able to select, "by aptitude", up to 10% of their intake. This "modern isation" of the comprehensive principle is extending selection, removing the comprehensive nature on nonspecialist schools and reducing their ability to reach high standards for all. It is argued against all logic that grammar and comprehensive schools can co-exist in the same area: selection and nonselection cannot co-exist.

It is also argued that grammar schools offer children a way out of poverty. Selecting a few children from a poor area, however, and leaving the rest in a lower tier of education creates not social justice but social exclusion. It is also claimed that grammar schools are beacons of excellence and should not be closed. They would not be closed but would merely change their character to give all children an equal and fair chance.

Finally, we still have substantial mainstream private fee-paying sector based on charitable status and funding, which provides privileged conditions and enhanced prospects only for already advantaged pupils. This issue has nothing to do with envy; it has everything to do with a just and prudent use of the state's resources.

The way forward

Most comprehensive schools serve a mixed community and include children of a wide range of ability. Some, however, especially in urban areas, contain smaller numbers of children who perform highly. As poverty may affect attainment in a variety of ways, such schools need positive discrimination through extra funding to provide improved pupilteacher ratios and other increased resources. A formula to allot resources in relation to a school's deprivation and intake would go far towards remedying educational and social disadvantage.

Parents have a right to express a preference for the comprehensive school they feel best meets the needs of their children. Admission policies must also take account of other factors such as school capacity, ability ranges, distance and LEA affiliation.

Each comprehensive school can develop specialisms depending on the interests of children and the range of expertise within the staff, but we must move away from the school as an autonomous, competitive unit seeking only what is best for itself and those who use it. Instead we should restore the notion of the school as an integral part of a community system working in partnership with other schools within a service dedicated to bring out the best in every child in a spirit of comprehensive co-operation.

It is essential to end selection in all its forms. This would complete the network of comprehensive schools serving the needs of the local community and the country at large. There is no alternative if we want the best for all our children.

Issued in September 2000 by the SEA, 12 Somerset Road, Stafford. ST17 9UZ,

from whom further copies are available at 20p each, (please send sae).

This may also be copied.

Links:

Green Paper

Cardiff conference

Estelle Morris and the ten foot barge pole

Return to Main Index

Never mind Will Hutton - he might have the luxury of sending his children elsewhere. The majority of parents do not have that choice and have to fight for all they can get - which isn't a vocational career of cleaning out hotel rooms and washing dishes.

The National Union of Teachers has responded to the Green Paper, firstly outlined in the text below. This has also been backed up by a determined and united approach from the National Conference in Cardiff. We print below the text of the National Union's circular.

EXECUTIVE PRIORITY MOTION (AS AMENDED) FOR CONFERENCE 2001

Green Paper "Schools: Building on Success"

Conference condemns the denigration of comprehensive education by the Government and believes the use of such terms as "bog standard" and "one size fits all" will do nothing but undermine the successes of pupils, teachers and school communities. It also deplores measures taken by the Government which lead to the retention and extension of selection for secondary education and seriously undermine the comprehensive principle.

Conference reaffirms its belief that equality of opportunity in high quality education can only be achieved through comprehensive education.

Conference therefore commits the Union to developing and promoting a vision of education for the 21 st century where:

(i) schools and colleges enjoy full state funding and are democratically accountable;

(ii) resources are allocated according to need rather than market forces or 'performance', so as to allow fully inclusive education and real equality of opportunity for all sections of the community; and

(iii) learning is based on principles of social justice rather than misconstrued notions of economic efficiency

Conference believes that the life chances of millions of young people could not have been enhanced without attending comprehensive schools.

Conference regrets that the proposals in the Green Paper will create a two-tier system of secondary education and rejects such an approach.

Conference welcomes the commitment made by the Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning in Wales to comprehensive education and her recognition that it is I working well in Wales' and is 'here to stay'. Conference rejects the view taken by the Prime Minister that the Government needs to set out a 'post-comprehensive argument'.

Conference urges the Government to recognise that comprehensive education has led to massive increases in pupil staying on rates and public examination successes.

Conference reaffirms its policy that all forms of overt and covert selection should be abolished and that comprehensive education should be extended in areas where selection remains. It calls upon the Government to legislate to end selection in those areas where it still lingers. It condemns the unnecessary and massive hurdles which have been placed in the way of those campaigning to end selection and calls upon all associations, divisions, members and the Union nationally to give full support to such campaigns."

Conference reaffirms also that, regardless of any notion of aptitude or ability, all pupils including pupils of all faiths and those who have none, should have access in every local education authority to comprehensive education in schools which are staffed by highly qualified and well-paid teachers.

Conference believes that the proposed favoured funding for certain categories of schools in the stratified system is inconsistent with the objective of providing high quality education for all our children.

Conference believes that the level of funding available to specialist schools should be available to all. Conference believes further that such inequities in the current funding system undermine equality of access rather than enhance parental choice. Conference recognises that in many areas the concept of parental choice is a chimera, and that the increased fragmentation and stratification of the school system leads to schools choosing and excluding students, rather than to any meaningful exercise of parental choice. Conference urges the Government, therefore, to adopt the Union's policy for a funding system which funds education equitably and meets additional educational need.

Conference believes also that the Government has failed to include proposals for recruiting and retaining teachers sufficient to tackle the teacher supply crisis.

Conference rejects the Government's proposal to extend control by the private sector to the management and running of schools.

Conference welcomes the positive proposals in the Green Paper, including those for early years, teachers' professional development and creativity. Conference regrets, however, that such proposals have been overshadowed by those that will lead to a two-tier system and a further narrowing of the curriculum through the introduction of new tests and targets. It deplores the attempt to force some schools to become City Academies, which are independent selective schools 'owned and run' by private sponsors who pay a minimal amount to their refurbishment and nothing to their future running costs. It condemns those local authorities which are prepared to give away a school and all its assets paid for over the years by their ratepayers, to see local democratic accountability for the school abolished, to exclude it from compliance with good educational legislation established to provide protection for pupils and their community and to deprive its staff of their legal protection for employment, salaries and conditions of service. Conference recognises that existing government policies have already had the effect of narrowing the curriculum and of creating an increasingly alienated school population.

Conference rejects the imposition by the Government of new primary school targets which would, as a consequence, lead to many schools facing unrealistic expectations.

Conference rejects also any establishment of crude academic and vocational pathways arising from Government proposals which will result in some schools not designated 'specialist' being turned into vocational secondary moderns with the sort of narrow curriculum and social exclusion associated with such schools in the past.. Conference believes that such pathways do not represent real choices for students but rather a process of exclusion from the broad and balanced curriculum that is every student's right.

Conference instructs the Executive, therefore, to give the, highest priority to publicising the Union's response to the Green Paper and to publicising and promoting the evidence and arguments for comprehensive education.

Conference further instructs the Executive to:

(a) 'ensure that the defence and promotion of comprehensive education is at the centre of the Union's campaigns during and after the General Election;

(b) combine the Union's statement, "Celebrating Comprehensive Education' with its response to the Green Paper with the purpose of setting out the Union's policies and objectives for a new Government.

(c) seek public endorsement for the paper from public figures, educationalists and

organisations, and to use it as part of the Union's campaign to resist the

Government's sustained attack on comprehensive education;

(d) to seek a joint agreement on a statement defending and promoting comprehensive education with other teacher organisations, the Trade Union Congress and organizations such as CASE and parent and governor organisations; and

(e) to organise, wherever possible with other education unions and campaigning organisations such as

CASE and the SEA, a national conference to publicise the statement and to promote comprehensive education.

(f) to ensure that resistance to the introduction and extension of the role of the private sector in managing -educational provision is equally at the centre of the Union's campaigns.

Lambeth NUT home page Complete list of contents Contacts at Lambeth NUT Dates - what's happening ? Conditions of Service Links to other sites
Copyright© 1999-2000 Lambeth Teachers' Association, Legal Notices, Privacy Policy
Editor Ray Sirotkin - Email: union@lta.demon.co.uk, Web Site Design & Technical Consultancy by Peter Ball of Computers For Linguists
This site has been tested on MS Internet Explorer 5 and Netscape Navigator 4.6. It is however intended to work well on most computers and with most software. If you have problems using this site please let us know.