Old NUT logo - links to national NUT site

Lambeth Teacher with Lambeth NUT

leading teachers in defence of education

Lilian Baylis - how will PFI work?

Photo of Lilian Baylis site ***

* * *Although there is no legal reason that prevents us using any organisation's logo, we are omitting the Lilian Baylis logo for now. Where we might otherwise have used a logo, we have decided to use other images. In this case we consider it pertinent to ask questions about the proposed PFI rebuild.

Private Finance Initiative - what's in it for the community

The Education Unions approached Education scrutiny on 19th March 2003 with a series of questions about the PFI (Private Finance Initiative) plans to rebuild Lilian Baylis. Ray Sirotkin (NUT) and Wendy Stevens (ATL) were the union questioners. John O'Keefe (Assistant Director, Finance) answered the questions.

We asked several questions - 15 in all ranging from who the company, Focus Education were to who will be running the day to day management of the school. Some of the answers were reassuring, some were not. In fairness, John answered fully and honestly, so we wouldn't wish to take him to task in any way.

However, we have to be wary of the problems ahead. To start with, Focus Education have no track record of building even a garden shed. They are a consortium bringing together Halifax Plc and Bovis construction. It is not clear whetehr this company will be borrowing money, but it could be at 5.5% - 1% higher than the rate at which the borough would borrow money. The project is expected to cost up to £20.4m, increased since last year. It could come to more, which is a worrying matter for the project. We are assured that this in itself does not mean that costs will be met by other education projects.

We attempted to discover the level of Unitary Charge - the annual payment to the builders to pay of the work opver 25 years. This can fluctuate and can be adjusted according to inflation. The charge is met by the school, LEA, revenue supportgrant and interest on positive balances (from the building account). We are told that the payments will not jeopardise other LEA projects. This will be true if LEA payments are from capital rather than revenue accounts. This will need to be scrutinised.

So, what if the contractor goes bust? With Halifax plc behind it, you wouldn't think this a problem as they have loadamoney. There is a world shortage of capital and has been for some time. One aftermath of the War on Iraq could make this more so. Suppose that Halifax plc need to scale back their programme due to financial considerations and pull the plug on Focus Education? If no other contractor is then found, Lambeth would take possession of the building, we are told.

What about day to day management? Lambeth, at least here, unlike elsewhere are not allowing the school to be run by building contractors. The contractors will be responsible for maintenance, but not for staffing, payroll and day to day management. Any shortfall in the construction receipts cannot be met by the school.

Thanks for your honest and straight forward answers, John even if we didn't hear what we'd have liked to hear. We will watch how things go.

The full questions and answers dialogue should be available from the scutiny committee minutes of 19.3.03 on the Lambeth website http://www.lambeth.gov.uk

What is the crisis in Lambeth's Secondary allocation?

For background news of the community campaign against PFI and selling the site
5 Reasons to reject PFI (PDF format)

Ballast go bust in Tower Hamlets - a warning to PFI fans

Copyright© 1999-2000 Lambeth Teachers' Association, Legal Notices, Privacy Policy